<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Differential Progression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alex.kavanagh.name/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name</link>
	<description>Random thoughts, differential progress ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on UK Biobank &amp; Privacy by NautiusMaximus</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2008/03/uk-biobank-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>NautiusMaximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=7#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Good point, Alex. I hadn&#039;t spotted that, but you are quite right. The data are not anonymised, and it&#039;s extremely naughty of them to say so.

There is a term that medical ethicists use to describe this kind of data handling, which is pseudonymised. That&#039;s the term they should have used. Anonymised is just wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Alex. I hadn&#8217;t spotted that, but you are quite right. The data are not anonymised, and it&#8217;s extremely naughty of them to say so.</p>
<p>There is a term that medical ethicists use to describe this kind of data handling, which is pseudonymised. That&#8217;s the term they should have used. Anonymised is just wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UK Biobank &amp; Privacy by alex</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2008/03/uk-biobank-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=7#comment-156</guid>
		<description>@NautiusMaximum:  I know, it&#039;s the whole trust issue that blows it for me.  If the data really were anonymous I might have considered, but saying it is anonymous and then admitting in the small print that it isn&#039;t is not the best way of building trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NautiusMaximum:  I know, it&#8217;s the whole trust issue that blows it for me.  If the data really were anonymous I might have considered, but saying it is anonymous and then admitting in the small print that it isn&#8217;t is not the best way of building trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UK Biobank &amp; Privacy by NautiusMaximus</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2008/03/uk-biobank-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>NautiusMaximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=7#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just had my invitation letter. When it comes to reassuring any concerns I may have had about protecting my privacy, they didn&#039;t get off to a good start.

Apparently they got my name, address, and date of birth from the NHS.

Excuse me?

I don&#039;t remember giving the NHS my permission to share that kind of data with third parties. I shall be finding out who the NHS data controller is and having a word. They claim that it&#039;s compliant with the data protection act, but I find that hard to believe.

Sorry, this may be a worthy research project, but they have just totally destroyed any chance they may have had of my trusting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just had my invitation letter. When it comes to reassuring any concerns I may have had about protecting my privacy, they didn&#8217;t get off to a good start.</p>
<p>Apparently they got my name, address, and date of birth from the NHS.</p>
<p>Excuse me?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember giving the NHS my permission to share that kind of data with third parties. I shall be finding out who the NHS data controller is and having a word. They claim that it&#8217;s compliant with the data protection act, but I find that hard to believe.</p>
<p>Sorry, this may be a worthy research project, but they have just totally destroyed any chance they may have had of my trusting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complex or Complicated? by alex</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2009/11/complex-or-complicated/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=81#comment-153</guid>
		<description>The family tree example you give is only complicated.  i.e. even though there are 10 generations creating a complicated family tree it will still be possible to examine each and every family member&#039;s relationship and understand it and its context within the family tree.  There is no emergent behaviour from the family tree, to in that sense it is similar to the 747 example; very complicated, but not complex.

However, in the same family there might be 3 or 4 generations still living.  Whilst the structure of the family tree is complicated, the behaviour of the members of the family would almost certainly be complex.  i.e. the behaviour of the members of the family as a system emerges as a consequence of their interactions.

Looking at any single member and their direct relationships or even individual behaviour would not provide sufficient information or analysis to understand the behaviour of the family system as a whole.  To study the whole family you have to study it at a system level and not at an individual member level.  In this case, it is even more complex because no single member can have a full perspective and understanding of the family system as a whole. Each brings their own experience, prejudices, partial perspectives and motivations to the mix resulting in behaviours that only emerge due to the interactions between the family members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The family tree example you give is only complicated.  i.e. even though there are 10 generations creating a complicated family tree it will still be possible to examine each and every family member&#8217;s relationship and understand it and its context within the family tree.  There is no emergent behaviour from the family tree, to in that sense it is similar to the 747 example; very complicated, but not complex.</p>
<p>However, in the same family there might be 3 or 4 generations still living.  Whilst the structure of the family tree is complicated, the behaviour of the members of the family would almost certainly be complex.  i.e. the behaviour of the members of the family as a system emerges as a consequence of their interactions.</p>
<p>Looking at any single member and their direct relationships or even individual behaviour would not provide sufficient information or analysis to understand the behaviour of the family system as a whole.  To study the whole family you have to study it at a system level and not at an individual member level.  In this case, it is even more complex because no single member can have a full perspective and understanding of the family system as a whole. Each brings their own experience, prejudices, partial perspectives and motivations to the mix resulting in behaviours that only emerge due to the interactions between the family members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complex or Complicated? by david coxon</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2009/11/complex-or-complicated/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>david coxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=81#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately i missed the codeworks think and a drink session. Your post is a really interesting one and your argued your case very well. I was recently considering writing something on &#039;what is clever&#039; which required very similar discussion.

Both complex and complicated come form the same word stem which generally means many different connected parts, however as i understand it complicate means make more complex therefore complicated simply means something which has many different interconnected parts which has bean made more so. 

Complex generally refers to physical atributes (including behaviour) but complicated can refer to both physical and imaginary, so a situation can be made more complex by rumours or beliefs. 

An example would be you can have complex relationships, ie lots of family members taken back 10 gererations can create a very complex family tree, but a complicated relationship, could involve a complex family structure made more complicated by extra parital relationship and family fued that prevent one side of a family talking to another (something that your previous example doesn&#039;t factor into its explanation and that could not be found by examining the parts) 

back over to you....
oh my explanation comes in part from the consise oxford english dictionary, couldn&#039;t quite but my finger on the difference without looking both words up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately i missed the codeworks think and a drink session. Your post is a really interesting one and your argued your case very well. I was recently considering writing something on &#8216;what is clever&#8217; which required very similar discussion.</p>
<p>Both complex and complicated come form the same word stem which generally means many different connected parts, however as i understand it complicate means make more complex therefore complicated simply means something which has many different interconnected parts which has bean made more so. </p>
<p>Complex generally refers to physical atributes (including behaviour) but complicated can refer to both physical and imaginary, so a situation can be made more complex by rumours or beliefs. </p>
<p>An example would be you can have complex relationships, ie lots of family members taken back 10 gererations can create a very complex family tree, but a complicated relationship, could involve a complex family structure made more complicated by extra parital relationship and family fued that prevent one side of a family talking to another (something that your previous example doesn&#8217;t factor into its explanation and that could not be found by examining the parts) </p>
<p>back over to you&#8230;.<br />
oh my explanation comes in part from the consise oxford english dictionary, couldn&#8217;t quite but my finger on the difference without looking both words up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Air travel inside the UK by alex</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2008/08/air-travel-inside-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=45#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Okay, substitute &#039;Photo ID&#039; for &#039;Passport&#039; above.  Why do I need photo ID to travel inside the country?  I don&#039;t need a Photo ID to catch a train or take the bus.  You could argue that I need Photo ID to drive a car.  I don&#039;t think you should - the old driving license never needed it.

Why is security so more intense for internal flights than for trains which carry more people?  I suspect the answer is &#039;because it is&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, substitute &#8216;Photo ID&#8217; for &#8216;Passport&#8217; above.  Why do I need photo ID to travel inside the country?  I don&#8217;t need a Photo ID to catch a train or take the bus.  You could argue that I need Photo ID to drive a car.  I don&#8217;t think you should &#8211; the old driving license never needed it.</p>
<p>Why is security so more intense for internal flights than for trains which carry more people?  I suspect the answer is &#8216;because it is&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Air travel inside the UK by Adam Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2008/08/air-travel-inside-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=45#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I regularly travel from Newcastle to Jersey and back, and have never needed a passport.

You do, however, require Photo ID. I use a driving license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regularly travel from Newcastle to Jersey and back, and have never needed a passport.</p>
<p>You do, however, require Photo ID. I use a driving license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UK Biobank &amp; Privacy by dotdot</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2008/03/uk-biobank-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>dotdot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=7#comment-63</guid>
		<description>thanks for the heads up - i just got an invite - alas i&#039;ll not be helping.

I&#039;m keen on saving the planet yes - but not via a non transparent process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the heads up &#8211; i just got an invite &#8211; alas i&#8217;ll not be helping.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m keen on saving the planet yes &#8211; but not via a non transparent process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Born Global by www.preiserhoehung.de</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2007/07/born-global/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>www.preiserhoehung.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajkavanagh.co.uk/blog/?p=3#comment-35</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello I like your post &#8220;Born Global&#8221; so well that I like to ask you whether I should translate and linking back. Please give me an answer. Your Preiserhöhung</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenMoko: Software and Hardware bugs by alex</title>
		<link>http://alex.kavanagh.name/2008/07/openmoko-software-and-hardware-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.kavanagh.name/?p=33#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Sadly not, they weren&#039;t available when I bought my Freerunner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly not, they weren&#8217;t available when I bought my Freerunner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
